While the use of drones is most often raised as a cautionary tale in the popular media, the commercial application of these aircraft has resulted in a rapidly expanding industry with diverse applications throughout Canada. According to Transport Canada, an estimated 193,500 drones are being flown in Canada, compared to only 37,000 “traditional” aircraft. The recreational drone community is estimated at 140,800 operators for 2018 with a projected increase to 225,500 operators by 2025. This rapid rise in numbers, combined with the limited skill and knowledge of many operators, has resulted in a number of dangerous incidents. As a result, Transport Canada recently published new regulations meant to create a “predictable and flexible regulatory environment conducive to long-term planning while …Keep reading
In a previous post, we discussed regulations proposed by Transport Canada in May 2016, setting out changes to provisions in the Canadian Aviation Regulations (“CARs”) that govern commercial seaplane operations. The proposed changes arose from recommendations made by the Transportation Safety Board of Canada following a seaplane accident that occurred in November 2009, near Saturna Island, British Columbia.
The draft regulations incorporated a requirement that all passengers of commercial seaplanes be instructed to wear a personal flotation device (which may be “worn” in a pouch that is attached to the person’s waist). Pilots would also be required to undergo specific training (and recurrent training every three years) to facilitate underwater egress after an accident occurs, and to further mitigate …Keep reading
Under Canada’s Aeronautics Act, the Minister of National Defence is required to designate a member of the Canadian Armed Forces or an employee of the Department of National Defence as the Airworthiness Investigative Authority (“AIA”). The AIA is responsible for advancing aviation safety by investigating military occurrences and military-civilian occurrences (which are accidents or incidents involving a civilian aircraft and a military aircraft). Canada’s Director of Flight Safety has been designated as the AIA.
Although the Aeronautics Act currently provides the AIA with many similar powers as those granted to Canada’s Transportation Safety Board, AIA investigators are presently not authorized to compel civilians (including civilian aviation companies performing contract work for the military) to provide statements or relevant documents …Keep reading
In previous posts (click here and here), we discussed the trial and appeal decisions in Casey v. Pel-Air Aviation Pty (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia). The issue to be determined was whether Ms. Casey could recover damages for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Because Ms. Casey had been travelling internationally at the time of the subject aircraft accident, her claim was exclusively governed by the Montreal Convention, an international treaty. The Montreal Convention only allows for the recovery of damages for “bodily injury” (i.e. physical injury) and not purely mental injury.
Contrary to prior jurisprudence, the trial court in Casey accepted that Ms. Casey’s PTSD could be a “bodily injury” in that it was an injury to her …Keep reading
On October 27, 2011, an aircraft crash-landed near the Vancouver International Airport. Six of the surviving passengers commenced a lawsuit against the aircraft operator seeking to recover damages arising from their injuries. The passengers were flying to Kelowna to attend an annual retreat organized by an organization named “The Executive Committee” (“TEC”). The TEC is a member-based community of over 900 chief executives, entrepreneurs, and business owners from across Canada. The passengers were founders and CEOs of various companies. TEC provides peer advice and support, through a “safe refuge” for executives to discuss work and personal issues. Each TEC member is required to attend meetings and pay annual dues for membership. The passengers’ dues were all paid by their companies. …Keep reading
Canada has the highest volume of seaplane operations in the world. The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (“TSB”) estimates that in the Vancouver Harbour alone, about 300,000 passengers travel on about 33,000 seaplane flights each year (see link). The Canadian Aviation Regulations (“CARs”) currently require that a personal flotation device (“PFD”) for each passenger be carried onboard the aircraft. However, occupants are not required to wear the PFD during the flight. Additionally, commercial seaplane pilots are not required to have underwater egress training, which teaches potentially life-saving strategies for exiting a submerged aircraft.
In November 2009, the pilot of a commercial seaplane initiated a left hand turn shortly after take-off from Saturna Island, British Columbia. During the turn, …Keep reading
Until August 1, 2015, the Canadian Aviation Regulations (the “CARS”) required at least one flight attendant for every 40 passengers on board a commercial aircraft. In 2013, Transport Canada (the regulator of aircraft operators) granted exemptions to several carriers, including Sunwing Airlines, allowing them to operate with a ratio of one flight attendant for every 50 passenger seats. European and U.S. carriers were already permitted to operate under a 1:50 ratio.
The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) represents flight attendants employed by several Canadian airlines. Over the past few years, CUPE has voiced strong opposition to the exemptions granted by Transport Canada. As mentioned above, the CARS were amended as of August 1, 2015, and now permit air operators …Keep reading
In November 2009, an aircraft operated by Pel-Air Aviation Pty Ltd (“Pel-Air”) flew from Sydney, Australia to Samoa to transport a seriously ill patient and her husband to Melbourne, Australia. The plane was scheduled to land at Norfolk Island (on its way to Melbourne) to refuel. It crashed during that leg of the flight and the doctor and nurse who were onboard the aircraft (Ms. Casey and Dr. Helm) were both seriously injured. They commenced an action against Pel-Air in the Supreme Court of South Wales.
As this case involved an international flight, Ms. Casey and Dr. Helm could only recover damages according to the provisions of the Montreal Convention, an international treaty that exclusively governs such cases. Courts around …Keep reading
Michel and Lynda Thibodeau (the “Thibodeaus”) launched several complaints before Canada’s Commissioner of Official Languages (the “Commissioner”) alleging that Air Canada had contravened its obligations under the Official Languages Act (“OLA”) to provide services in French. They alleged that on two trips they made in 2009, Air Canada had failed to offer services in French at check-in counters, boarding gates and aboard flights on which there was significant demand for services in French, and that it made passenger announcements only in English.
The Commissioner found that all but two of the complaints had merit. The matter then proceeded before the Federal Court of Canada, which awarded $6,000 in damages to each of the Thibodeaus, representing $1,500 per violation. The Federal …Keep reading
On June 20, 2014, the Government of Canada announced sweeping changes to its Temporary Foreign Worker Program, many of which were effective immediately. Pilots are one of very few specific occupations that were singled out in the changes.
Under the former system, employers were required to obtain authority to hire a foreign worker through a “Labour Market Opinion”. Employers must now apply for a Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA), which is a more comprehensive and rigorous process. The LMIA must include information about the number of Canadians who have applied for the available job, the number of Canadians interviewed, and an explanation of why those Canadians were not hired. A new job matching service has been introduced in an effort …Keep reading