In a previous post, we wrote about a lawsuit arising from the 2003 crash of a Cirrus SR-22 in low visibility near Hill City, Minnesota. In the lawsuit, the next of kin of the pilot and passenger claimed that Cirrus and a university failed to provide the pilot with adequate flight training on the subject aircraft.
The appeal court found that the claim for inadequate training could not succeed as Cirrus did not owe a duty to the pilot to provide training. In addition, the claims were barred by the “educational malpractice doctrine”. The policy behind this doctrine is that courts are considered to be inadequately suited to determine the standard or quality of education provided by an institution. …Keep reading